Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Avenue, Irvine, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard Avenue, Irvine, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable local street created by 21rojasjustyn (talk · contribs). Previously deleted by prod under Harvard Avenue (Irvine, California) and then re-prodded under this name, but the second prod was removed (as it should have been as prod can only be used once). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton Parkway, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Hill Avenue, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlsbad Village Drive for more context. David Eppstein (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG pretty easily. hewhoam areismyself 06:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—not notable. Imzadi 1979 → 14:55, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to run through a rather nice public park, but otherwise completely non-notable - it's just a piece of tarmac! -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 00:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sourced indication that is anything more than just another non-notable road. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 13:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG I did some WP:BEFORE and found only stores that occupy that avenue. Lightburst (talk) 17:42, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom and others. MB 02:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no question that this fails WP:GNG. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.