Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard–MIT Mathematics Tournament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Seems to meet the criteria for Speedy keep as per #2 and/or #3. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 11:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard–MIT Mathematics Tournament[edit]

Harvard–MIT Mathematics Tournament (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page does not explain why this topic is notable, nor does it cite any sources. The references tag currently on the page was set up over a decade, and still isn't resolved. Winmaster123 (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Winmaster123 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's "rescue list", here. Hijiri 88 (やや) 12:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Frivolous nomination by a suspicious new account. One might be forgiven for having April 2013 flashbacks. Hijiri 88 (やや) 12:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinged here. Like everything Harvard-related it's probably got plenty of coverage, but I'm on mobile for much of today so I'm gonna toss this to David Epstein for a cross-country perspective. EEng 12:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably EEng meant User:David Eppstein. (Why hasn't User:David Epstein been UN-blocked, by the way? I guess back in 2007 the username creation filter didn't prevent names that were that similar to existing users...) Hijiri 88 (やや) 12:56, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.