Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hartley Jackson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hartley Jackson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AfD was a no consensus purely due to sock activity preventing a full review. Fails the notability test in pro wrestling and the article relies too heavily on Cage Match. His activity in Pro Wrestling NOAH is limited at best and notability is not inherited, and sources otherwise are virtually non existent. Plainly not notable. Addicted4517 (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable wrestler.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article was declined at AFC but created here anyway, the only reason it survived last time was because a sock initiated the AfD. This fails GNG and nothing has improved in four years.LM2000 (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete, refs don't support notability, the nom is quite correct in the appraisal. Szzuk (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep,for same reason as 1st nomination he has just became a trainer at the WWE Performance Center and made a Lethwei debut https://twitter.com/HartleyJackson_/status/1063935599525195776 https://www.instagram.com/p/Be1XQDWFpPa/

https://www.instagram.com/p/BeCI7Q3F8wM/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8pqXEqo5ug https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6Qz0g_2f-U

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.101.171.18 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not reliable sources. 2001:8003:591D:2400:15EB:183:392E:EB72 (talk) 12:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can now confirm the claim of WWE PC coach is a lie. Hartley is not listed on the Performance Centre website as a coach. 2001:8003:591D:2400:D1C6:F235:E6F9:3D77 (talk) 23:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient for GNG. I searched Australian newspapers via ProQuest I only found 1 article containing an arguably sufficient mention, which I have added to page to see if that helps it, but I don't think it's enough to justify keeping...Cabrils (talk) 23:37, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.