Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harshvardhan Joshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 01:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harshvardhan Joshi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mountaineer, who has climbed mount everest once, most of the news references are routine. No RS, fails Anybio Mikekohan (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mikekohan (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the nomination is Mikekohan's seventh edit ever, with flawless knowledge of the deletion process, including both talk page notices and deletion sorting. Geschichte (talk) 10:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It seems like the nominator Mikekohan, created the account with a lack of information regarding the guidelines. No edits were made apart from nominating two pages for deletion without checking the available sources about the topic. Multiple sources related to the topic and clearly passes the WP:GNG. Bigstory1 (talk) 07:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The page can be improved further, but the subject is well-sourced to make reasonable claims of notability and certainly passes WP:GNG. Google News gives the sources for the person over a long enough period of time from reliable domains. e.g. Independent UK, Times of India, INDIA TV, ABP News, The Himalayan Times.

And to be fair, it feels Mikekohan nominated the page for deletion just for underlying reasons (depending on the intent), not legitimate problems with the article. UphillAthlete (talk) 17:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 20:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:BLP1E. A WP:TOOSOON case. But, apart from this, I'm in total agreement with Geschichte's comment. Also, there is a high possibility about the existence of "two" factions in this AfD discussion that are simultaneously trying to influence the outcome and it surely includes the nominator, a SPA. Closing admin should take a note on this. - Hatchens (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In the absence of a specific NSPORTS criteria, evaluating sources based on WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:GNG shows nothing that's independent. Vice article is very long, but exclusively depends on the subject himself for all the photos and the details. Hindu article is just an announcement or a brief interview at best. ToI pieces are, as usual, interviews re-framed as articles. Same goes for the sources found above as well as others from searching. Hemantha (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.