Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Patel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Patel[edit]

Harsh Patel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bio based on self-published sources. The one main claim for notability, the MakerSquare school, has its own article, and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Google search found no in-depth coverage (a few passing mentions and an apparently different second "Harsh Patel"). GermanJoe (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: pure promotional/vanity page. Quis separabit? 19:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and I was going to suggest moving to the company's article but my searches suggest that company is not fully notable and the best results were here and here. As such, I will likely nominate that company article soon as there's simply not much for an article yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable and it seems like there is a lot of single-issue editing going on with this group of articles.Derek Andrews (talk) 10:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.