Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Gawali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Gawali

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Current ref might not be reliable with no editorial policies, and could fall under WP:BLP1E. A WP:BEFORE found promotional and routine announcements, 1 (routine "Partnered Content"), 2 (almost entirely interview-like quotes, only 138 words without quotes), 3 (promotional, non-RS), 4 (promo and routine). After my PROD User:Ddfdfgsdffdg deprodded with the rationale different person, but did not improve the article or provide additional sources. VickKiang (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 21:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find any in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Can't find much news references about them that they pass WP:GNG 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 (talk) 04:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC) - strike sock - Beccaynr (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems to fail WP:BLP1E, indeed. --Suitskvarts (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Contributor008 (talk) 09:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not even worthy to encyclopedia. It needs to be deleted immediately because it fails WP:GNG. It contains only one non reliable reference.Kasar Wuya (talk) 12:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete No any Deepth Covrage WP:SIGCOV do not meet WP:GNG. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC) - strike sock - Beccaynr (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even searching for his name in Hindi, हर्ष गवली, doesn't turn up more than the flood work (likely WP:BLP1E) or his modeling/fitness tips (promotional/non-independent). There's a cricketer with the same name who turns up more coverage, but I don't see any indication that they're the same person. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.