Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter (plot)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Harry Potter (plot) was vandalised; original article ok, please check diffs in future. Plot summary just redirected to book. Speedy close.. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter (plot)[edit]

Also: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Full Plot Summary for the same reasons.

This is a simple soft redirect to a wikibook. No WP articles link to here (some talk pages do. Harry Potter book pages diligently link to respective Wikibooks so there is a minute risk of recreation. Swift 01:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter (plot)'s sections were merged into the books' plot overview (e.g. here from here). Redirect to Harry Potter to keep edit history. No such issues with Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince - Full Plot Summary, so delete. TimBentley (talk) 02:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That merge was minute. The main content was transwikied to Wikibooks. This page is an orphan, nothing links to it. Let's delete! --Swift 02:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Both. Info has already appropriately merged and transwikied, and I don't believe these would ever be search terms for someone looking for this information. --Satori Son 04:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete both as A1. Each article contains at this time a dead template link, ergo is content free. Just about to tag as such.... --Dennisthe2 17:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: OK, so it's more like an A3 than an A1. Also, the other article is locked for some reason. I can only guess. --Dennisthe2 17:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.