Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Larry Jenkinz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE, A7. postdlf (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Harry Larry Jenkinz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hoax article created with a series of false citations to give the appearance of being sourced. No matches for this name in GBooks or GNews archives. Fæ (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G3 and/or A7? ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 05:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The trouble here is that there are (unsourced) claims of notability and it is not a fully blatant hoax. Fæ (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Anyway this (obvious autobio) article fails WP:MUSICBIO. (I do not see any claim of notability). ۞ Tbhotch™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 05:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The trouble here is that there are (unsourced) claims of notability and it is not a fully blatant hoax. Fæ (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At best just a non-notable individual, but likely a hoax. Qrsdogg (talk) 15:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.