Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Cook (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Cook (actor)[edit]

(Contested prod.) Fails notability guideline at WP:ENTERTAINER - the two film credits listed are yet to be released. In fact, there's not even any evidence that the second has gone into production. A fair bit of the article is copy/pasted from the sources used (mainly his IMDb bio and that published by his agent). Deletion is not cleanup, so I won't elaborate on its reading like a resume, the POV and the desperate need for a copyedit/wikifying. —97198 (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At the risk of sounding mocking, can I say the lead sentence is the least NPOV sentence I have read on Wiki. Unfortunately, at this stage the subject does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER nor does the subject meet the general notability guideline. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 12:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources offered not sufficient to establish notability to pass WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:N, blatantly promotional.--Boffob (talk) 12:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not established. WWGB (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At least wait for the movie to come out. -- Mwanner | Talk 15:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no non-trivial third party coverage of this person. The two film credits include one film yet to be released, and another that doesn't even have a title yet - not a really great indicator of importance. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:33, 15 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.