Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Cichy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:34, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity page, written by editor who claims [1] to be its subject. Unusual writing style: see article. Regarding notability: 300 Google hits for subject, of which all of those I have reviewed so far appear, by writing style or contributor name, to be his own press releases and postings to various Internet forums. Delete -- The Anome 10:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or at the very least clean it the fuck up. Seriously, I'd rather look at a jarful of smashed anuses than that article. It's that bad. I do see that Harry Cichy has been mentioned in the news a couple of times, but those articles aren't about him, he's just a spokesman for a consumer group. Most of the hits I get for him are from his intense campaign of posting all over the place. -- Captain Disdain 10:40, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 10:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this unless someone who is not on methamphetamines can rewrite it. Ifnord 11:35, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn. *drew 11:51, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as NN crank/vanity article. Googling his name comes up with a number of BB posts by him and anonymous posts about him, all about some incomprehensible paranoia he has about Maytag and Hoover. See, e.g., [2] ("Some of the Maytag representatives wear FBI- sytle [sic] ear pieces." Uh-huh, sure.) - Sensor 13:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable and vanity issues abound. Sliggy 16:04, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as per Angr. Yuk. Flapdragon 20:46, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as per above. This article made me start twitching uncontrollably. I think I better go lie down now. 23skidoo 23:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete writtern by the subject (Wikipedia:Autobiography). If he's notable, someone else will write him an article sooner or later. Also many style and POV issues. However, I must comment that some of the editors above need to observe the WP:CIVIL guideline. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 22:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- (Non-voting comment from nominator: Sandy Jack appears to be an offshoot of this article). -- The Anome 09:28, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.