Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harris Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From tone of writing to non-notable company. No references are found to this degree of claims made by this company. Highly and only promotional. No Encyclopedic notability. The company that acquired even non-notable. Light2021 (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I will reserve !vote for now, but here is some press that may be relevant [1] [2]. Appears that it merged with Shoply and Anyware so not sure what the current name of all three are. I removed some puffery from the page. I also believe from the articles it is publicly traded. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the links above are still only advertising the company from either its own words or republished, none of it convincing or substantial, my own searches are finding exactly this and so we cannot accept it as actual meaningful sources; the article itself is noticeably advert-formatted and the enormously large number of advertising-only accounts certainly emphasize this, therefore we take no compromises with such blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 23:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- largely unreferenced promo copy on an unremarkable tech company. No value to the project; WP:TNT this page. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 08:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.