Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harriet Grant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Grant

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability outside of being a famous person's wife and a small role in one notable event. Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the limited content to Scooter Libby which already mentions their relationship. She doesn't seem independently notable based either on marriage or clients as a lawyer; but might be relevant to Libby's bio. Colapeninsula (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Her being the wife of Scotter Libby is no claim to fame. Interviewing Anita Hill as one of a team of lawyers is also not a show of notability. No actual show of notability here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete do not assert notability Legal Seagull (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.