Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold G. Fox Moot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harold G. Fox Moot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for a moot lacking notability. Sourced mostly by it's own site or by an article written by a founder. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. nothing satisfying WP:N. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL -- it's too new to have many good sources proving notability. We are not going anywhere; this can be re-created when it becomes notable in a few years. Bearian (talk) 21:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.