Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Fitzpatrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Fitzpatrick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, England, and Scotland. Joeykai (talk) 03:59, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:42, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no evidence of BEFORE being undertaken when sources like this (which I found on the first page of Google by searching for 'Harold Fitzpatrick Liverpool' which took me here, and then I clicked 'All articles about Harry Fitzpatrick on PlayUpLiverpool.com.') show that historical and significant newspaper coverage is present, showing notability. Giant Snowman 07:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep On looking for sources and article expansion in the short space of time this morning, between Alvaldi and myself I feel there is more than enough out there. Online sources are not the best, I am sure there will be some WP:OFFLINESOURCES, all in all. I feel there is more than enough to satisfy basic GNG. Govvy (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.