Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harikrish Menon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 00:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harikrish Menon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC. nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Keep per Mkativerata. (The correct search terms are actually Hari Krish Menon, or Hari “Krish” Menon; this likely accounts for the nominator not finding any results.) Werner Heisenberg (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 02:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now, let’s see. How many national news articles do we have where this guy is the sole subject? I count 1, 2, 3, 4. The same number of ill-considered Malaysian-related AfDs that I’ve seen so far today. Keep, obviously. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment even under alternate spelling, does not generate a lot of coverage [2]. if significant coverage is found in Malay I will happily reconsider. LibStar (talk) 03:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How do four articles in national newspapers where the subject is the only subject of the articles not qualify as significant coverage? Again, read each of the four sources I provided above, and reconsider. --Mkativerata (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 05:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:10, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per new sources. Joe Chill (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.