Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardtop (C.O.P.S.)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hardtop (C.O.P.S.) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A minor character without any reliable third person sources or notability it should be merged or deleted
Dwanyewest (talk) 21:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's no indication that this character, who appeared in a cartoon that was only broadcast for 1 year, is notable. --Griseum (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Consists entirely of original research. Pcap ping 06:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- merge adequately the information is verifiable, being based as it should be on the fiction itself. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Although YouTube is allowed as evidence you can't used illegal sourced YouTube videos hence why I removed the article earlier.WP:YOUTUBE
Dwanyewest (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, then Redirect to C.O.P.S. to annihilate pure WP:PLOT regurgitation. Abductive (reasoning) 08:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without the redirect. It's not even a plausible search term. The article is 100% cruft, nothing but plot summary and trivia; and without any sources to even satisfy WP:V we can conclude only that this article is pure original research. Reyk YO!
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.