Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haram (short film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haram (short film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable short film, article created by editor who works for production company, citations do not offer significant coverage of the film per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 22:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. I disagree that the sources in the article are insignificant. Both of them are independent and sufficiently developed enough sources to be considered moderately in depth. However, there are only two quality RS, and a BEFORE search yielded nothing else. If we had a third quality reference I would be voting keep. As it is, not enough coverage to pass GNG or NFILM.4meter4 (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete This has *one* good RS - and that's all, so its not substantiated as notable. With a couple more it would be keep. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:GNG. It has at least three articles in mainstream newspapers. [1] in Malayala Manorama, [2] in Mathrubhumi and [3] in The New Indian Express. Two of these are already cited in the article, probably more can be found in Malayalam language sources which aren't indexed well on google. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The above references, though reliable, lack significant coverage. They only provide information on plot, cast and crew without any critical commentary, thus falling short of WP:NFSOURCES. Would be glad to revise my !vote if other sources are found to establish notability. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Surely fails WP:NF. Kolma8 (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.