Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Schenk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harald Schenk[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find solid sources for several other Harald Schenks, but not for this one, so it looks like he does not pass WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with above editor Freeranging intellect (talk) 16:25, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 04:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG or any criterion given in WP:NACADEMIC. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF, WP:GNG, or any other notability criterion. As the nominator suggests, there is another Harald Schenk with a couple of reasonably-cited publications on scanning mirrors but he appears unrelated and even then the case for WP:PROF#C1 would have been borderline. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.