Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Sindane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Sindane[edit]

Non-notable per WP:BLP1E. لenna vecia 03:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:BLP. The subject is a private citizen who is not likely to be written about in the history books, and deserves to be allowed to live the rest of his life without the first web search result for his name to be a reminder of troubled times. I refer to WP:BLP rather than WP:BLP1E because I mean that it is the spirit of this policy that dictates deletion, not one clause that is more often misused that used in the correct spirit. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:17, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.