Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Nightmare Baby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - No valid reason for deletion - "Unreferenced" isn't a valid reason by a long shot and you need to explain why it's "not notable", Anyway Michig's proved it is notable and has provided sources for the article to be "sourced/referenced" so closing as SK (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Nightmare Baby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's only 'unreferenced' because nobody has turned the review link into a citation. This album got plenty of coverage when it came out and more since then, some of which might have been found if it had been searched for, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 09:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.