Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hao Lulu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. v/r - T P 03:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hao Lulu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe that this "artificial beauty" is sufficiently notable. WP:15M. Delete. Nlu (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, reasonable international coverage, and the story is somewhat unique, or rare, as we dont have many complete makeovers like this, esp. for someone young and not disfigured genetically or by accident. refs need a lot of work, of course.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 06:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've just added 4 more reliable sources that give significant coverage. Her name, both in Chinese and English, gets plenty of G hits. Pol430 talk to me 23:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Though I don't read Chinese the sources provided in the external links section look sufficient. However, this BLP needs inline citations. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.