Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannu Karpo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. See [1]. MrPrada (talk) 06:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hannu Karpo

non notable, non sourced original research, not verified, doesn't assert notability. NewAtThis (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Tag for references, but I would say that the host of a notable television program is notable, and is clearly asserted as such. This individual has an article in the Finnish Wikipedia, and the Internet Movie Database. Looks easily sourceable, and I implore the nominator to do a brief Google search before setting up an AfD for every unreferenced article they come across.--Canley (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment lots of people are in the IMdB, even two bot one time extras sometimes...i challenge you to explain what makes this individual notable, and also prove it with multiple secondary sources, we can't have unbiased articles without them. Thats finnish wiki, and has no standing here. finnish is also a stub of dubious notability IYAM (if you ask me)NewAtThis (talk) 03:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep RS coverage from his earlier career, and the Finnish article is sourced. Because you can't read it doesn't mean it's not notable TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 03:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well can you translate it - most of us arent finnish. Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 04:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nor am I, but that's what {{expert}} is for or request help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Finland, not AfD TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.