Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HandsFree Networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HandsFree Networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a small software company provides nothing to support notability. The references are to press releases, a patent and a wiki, and searching found no substantial independent coverage (which is not surprising for a 45-person company). Created by an SPA editor who works for the company. Related content was speedy deleted several times at the name Handsfree Networks, but this version is somewhat expanded, so I'm nominating it here. RL0919 (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
CB-delete Fails WP:N, WP:RS. Appears to be WP:SPAM. Ikluft (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very limited coverage on the web, and appearance of WP:COI. Network World Fusion, Channel Web twice, an American Express B2B promotion site. No indication of WP-level notability in the article itself. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obvious advertising as well: ...a global provider of software and services that automate the resolution of technology problems. HandsFree Networks support automation software platform has provided the ability to precisely identify, diagnose and resolve technical problems via proactive, assisted or traditional support automation. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.