Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn & TensorFlow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 12:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn & TensorFlow[edit]

Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn & TensorFlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This book does not appear to meet WP:NBOOK. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:17, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • One of many books on this subject. Too early to determine whether this particular book will become a classic (published this year). Delete. --bender235 (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. could not find any third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this is one of the many books on this subject. Self help books about technologies are quite common. This one has been recently published and I cannot see any particular significance to distinguish it from the rest.--DreamLinker (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.