Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanaa Naguib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:10, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hanaa Naguib[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this subject meets the notability guideline for academics. No reliable sources that show how WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions and are insufficient on which to base a WP:BLP. Contested PROD. Kinu ^t/_c 21:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Similar to the article on Esmat_Yahia, this one lacks references, and the links provided are not in English so I couldn't check them. I did some editing of the article for comprehension, but I do not think this passes WP:NOTABILITY. LaMona (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 6. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 06:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not seem to meet notability standards for either academics or ballerinas. Deb (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable Op47 (talk) 18:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.