Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamza Haniffa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hamza Haniffa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the requirements of WP:ANYBIO / WP:GNG. Is mainly a collection of primary sources and self promotional material. None of the "awards" are notable awards and almost all of them lack verifiable reference citations. Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable Sri Lankan businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is a one of richest Sri Lankan businessman in our country. Im also Sri Lankan.and also he is the icon of Sri Lanka in 2017 I have physical news Paper about him. Any Sri Lankan person know who is hamza. User:Lyricsfox (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyircsfox (talk • contribs)

Comment. You need to provide definitive evidence rather than making empty statements. As I can tell you I don't know who Hamza Haniffa is and a search of the web doesn't show any reliable secondary sources that back your claims. Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of nobility. This editor has been creating articles which are pure spam. Mostly likely UPE. RationalPuff (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.