Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamsterball (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamsterball (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced, no assertion of notability. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use {{ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Regardless of current condition, burden is on the nominator to look for sources before coming to AfD. Indeed there's nothing on the Raptisoft game, but there's enough on the TikGames game—reviews in three major video game publications: IGN, Eurogamer, and Play (UK magazine) (see the Metacritic listing). So we're looking at repurposing and dropping the disambig after this closes. Those reviews are enough, but there are a few other small articles in a video game reliable sources search. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹ 01:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - enough sources appear to be available. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's notable enough, despite the current, unfortunate condition. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.