Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamish Daud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 17:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hamish Daud[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

articles was twice dePROD without explantion. Not notable actor Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actor. For the record though, articles should only ever be prodded once. If they are deprodded, even with no explanation, the article should be brought to AfD, not prodded again.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A BLPPROD-tag was removed twice (correctly) because it was placed in error (BLPPROD cannot be used when there are sources, not matter how reliable). However, since this might also indicate that deletion is not uncontroversial, I'm relisting this instead of assuming it is a case of WP:NOQUORUM.

I will allow to myself to disagree here. Articles did not have any sources beside personal profiles of the person itself. It barely constitutes as sources. BTW, it still does not have any sources at all. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:34, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant roles in Gangster, Spy in Love, My Trip My Adventure, Love You... Love You Not and Trinity, The Nekad Traveler all of which appear notable. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are no any sources confirming the significance of the roles. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My Trip [1]. He is the host, show has two Indonesian Choice Awards nominations. Love You, [2] shows his significance. Trinity [3], "RICHARD OH: Writer is back with two inspiring new projects" by Cynthia Webb in The Jakarta Post, 30 March 2012 shows his significance. See also "Raisa and Hamish have a lot of fans who idolize them and dream of having a spouse like them one day." from Guess what?: Raisa and Hamish break fans’ hearts. When looking at an Indonesian subject look at Indonesian sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia can't be source to itself. IMDB is not reliable source, since it's community based. BTW, Indonesian artciles does not have any sources as well. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added Gangster and Spy in Love to the above list [4] [5] [6]. Another source for Trinity [7] and for Love You [8]. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.