Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Mathematics Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to William Rowan Hamilton#Death and afterwards. Without prejudice to retargeting the redirect if Trinity or a section of it becomes a better target. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton Mathematics Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. I did propose a merge, 2 support St170e and L E X commons, 1 oppose (David Eppstein on the grounds that it wasn't worthy of a section in the main article when other departments didn't have that, but agreed it was of dubious notability. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; time for a resolution. Michael Hardy removed prod. Boleyn (talk) 08:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 08:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge. No RS present to establish stand-alone notability. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but do not merge. I'm also not convinced that this is independently notable, but as I already wrote in Talk:Trinity College, Dublin re an ongoing merge proposal from last August, it seems to be too low-level an academic subunit of Trinity to have any place on the main article for the whole university, and there is no intermediate-level article to merge to. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to William Rowan Hamilton#Death and afterwards, where it is mentioned. The Institute doesn't seem to be independently notable, as I could not find much in the way of secondary sources that were not PR. But that it exists and was formed as part of the 200th anniversary of Hamilton's birth is verifiable and is mentioned in Hamilton's article. The institution is a plausible search term, so a redirect seems reasonable. --Mark viking (talk) 10:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Mark viking. ww2censor (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hamilton or TCD. Snappy (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.