Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton-Madison House
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Mr.Z-man 23:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hamilton-Madison House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Speedy was declined. An advertisement. If the article is cleaned up so that it's not an advertisement, it will still be in AFD per WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 01:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only external link doesn't even refer to the subject by name. Also, blatant copyright violation. Bongomatic (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn spam. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 07:49, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article is spammy, but i was in the process of working on it & removing t he copyvio. Its a major social service agency and refs are available. DGG (talk) 02:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Then why don't you prove that refs are available instead of doing a sources are out there keep? Schuym1 (talk) 22:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I agree with DGG. The article should be fixed rather than deleted. andy (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's a pity the nominator didn't do a Google Books search before nominating. I've added some of the 226 sources found to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.