Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamid Zangeneh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Despite the assertion of additional sources, they don't seem to provide notability, and WP:NPROF doesn't seem to be met. ansh 666 04:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hamid Zangeneh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet notability criteria, has too little substance, and too few sources Schnapps17 (talk) 20:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that it is my opinion that he does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (academics) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnapps17 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable academic, I've added sources and more are available. Jonpatterns (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google scholar shows citation count too low for WP:PROF#C1 [1]. Journal editor could pass a different WP:PROF criterion but only for a significant and well-established journal, which this one doesn't seem to be. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 13:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So... what happens now that this has been relisted twice with no more input?Schnapps17 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.