Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamamni Persian Baths
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge into Zanzibar and editorialise. First up, the nomination was just a vote, not a nomination at all. Secondly, that vote was one for merging. Now, AfD is not the place to go if you want an article to be merged. You can do that yourself. Maybe we should have a Wikipedia:Request for merge page for those who want a merge but don't know how? But we've already got those purdy tags ... fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Zanzibar as there isn't enough information even on the linked site to warrant an entire article. Iamvered 00:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nom. Tom Harrison Talk 00:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's not one of the seven wonders of the world, but it qualifies as a geography stub. Ruby 01:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I actually agree with Ruby, but the fact is that if left where it is, this shall remain totally neglected, visited only by the occasional bot or two. Merging back to the main article may bring it some attention from the much larger number of editors who work on the Zanzibar page. In this case, merging is in practice better than keeping. Eusebeus 04:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep Qualifies as a geographical stub... per Ruby Nick Catalano (Talk) 17:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Won't something like this with so little reference forever be a stub? I say let's merge it soon! Iamvered 03:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep valid topic. Dsmdgold 13:42, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per agove. —This user has left wikipedia 10:10 2006-02-02
- Merge to Zanzibar#Culture --M@rēino 17:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.