Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo unyielding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 21:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halo unyielding

This article has some clarity issues. Reading the article, I couldn't glean enough information about the topic to easily iron it out, or to judge whether it should be merged into another article or not. Haikon 11:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's relatively non-notable, but it can't really be merged with anything else, and it has been mentioned on other linked sites. I'd say Cleanup and Keep. Bronzey 10:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

relisted Patstuart^talk·edits 19:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Delete. Fan fiction and fan films aren't notable by default, and I don't see anything in this article, or anywhere else, that convinces me that it's special. Being linked from web forums and made available on Halo machinima sites doesn't count - creations like Red vs. Blue are notable because they get picked up on by significant entities (newspapers, Microsoft, etc). Zetawoof^(ζ) 22:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - very strange. Would be good if there were some more info. Definitely needs a Cleanup. Given some of the articles on wikipedia I wouldn't automatically assume it is not notable enough to not keep. (how's that? three negatives in a row..) cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 23:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of machinima deletions. — TKD::Talk 08:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This production fails WP:WEB. After filtering out forums, blogs, and Wikipedia and its mirrors, Google returns 81 unique hits, most of which would still be unreliable sources. Given that machinima is a genre / production process that thrives over the Internet, it's rather hard to justify keeping the article at this time. — TKD::Talk 08:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.