Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloween (2011 film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was } snow delete. Blueboy96 21:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Halloween (2011 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails future film notability guideline. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Delete per nom. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No solid information to base an article on at this stage. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This film can really happen. At least let it stand for a couple of months, and if no reference shows up then, then feel free. But for now, there are rumors going around that there will be a film. So please let it stay for a little while. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themenace1990 (talk • contribs) - moved by Onorem♠Dil 14:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC) from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloween II (2011 film) after a page moved messed up the link to this discussion [reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't have articles for things that could happen. --Onorem♠Dil 14:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No references, may be a hoax. Macy (Review me!) 14:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia isn't a rumor mill. If sources appear that confirm the upcoming nature of this film, then an article may be appropriate. ◄Zahakiel► 14:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Note: The article has been renamed to Halloween II (2011 film). --DanielRigal (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete - If actual references (rather than rumors) show up, the page can be recreated. But right now, there's, as someone above me said, "no solid information." --AquaHaute (talk) 14:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with not a crystal ball. That would just be silly. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 15:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My reasons for deletion have been stated by others. I believe WP:SNOW applies here. Does anyone oppose this? SWik78 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No disagreement, there's no chance this will be kept. Ice it. ◄Zahakiel► 18:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CRYSTAL. ArcAngel (talk) 18:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article is purely based on rumors, and there is no body. Plus, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. – Obento Musubi (C • G • S) 18:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Just an infobox, no sources, no content. 23skidoo (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice. No sources; too far in the future for even IMDB to have it. Way too much WP:CRYSTAL; if the film actually gets off the ground in a couple of years, then the article can be recreated. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If the film actually comes into production, then create the article again. Until then no. Ijanderson977 (talk) 20:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice when the time comes. This is just way too far out, and we're talking about a film here, speculatively, not the Olympics. WP:CRYSTAL firmly applies. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.