Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haliburton Sculpture Forest (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. At first it appeared that this discussion was also headed for "no consensus" but this !vote was made to the first AFD 12 days after it closed. I suspect he was trying to post to this AFD. In any case, there have been 2 AFDs in the past month and in both we have 3 "keep" !votes and no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I think that settles the issue for now. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Haliburton Sculpture Forest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Relisting: Strongly appears to fail WP:NOTE:
Unclear listings outside of travel blogs and travel directories: Google search — Google news search — Google Scholar search - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 15:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, nominator is seeing the huge number of travel-selling sites who see this as a chance to cash in. But ask yourself this, what are they cashing in ON? There is a considerable number of potential cites that provide RS evidence of notability.
- See the nine sources Maple Lake + 400-eleven + World News Network + Iron Jive + Rails End Gallery + Flickr photo collection + Daughters of Circe + Willow Beach + Forest Festival and many more than I have time to chase down.
- Note also that the nominator errs in showing the Google results for the 2nd page, which has many ads, and not the first, which has only one. Anarchangel (talk) 23:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.