Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Baumgarten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Baumgarten[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Most of the sources are little more than "D-day vet revisits Normandy" or interviews which lack independence. Neither are any of the criteria of WP:SOLDIER met. Nthep (talk) 14:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Everyone else prominent enough to be featured on the History Channel's programs about World War II has a bio on Wikipedia. If Baumgarten was wounded at Normandy, received a Bronze Star Medal, wrote a credible book about his experiences, and engaged in other activities which establish his prominence, he should be profiled. The article meets the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:SOLDIER. Rammer (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets GNG in multiple ways, WP:SOLDIER, WP:AUTHOR, WP:KICKASSGUY —Мандичка^YO 😜 19:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't see any real notability. Private who got a very minor award (at a level not even considered a true medal by many countries rather than anywhere near the level we usually require for an article - in Britain we call this level of bravery award a mention in dispatches!), wrote his memoirs and has appeared on TV talking about his experiences just like hundreds of other veterans. It's a load of old drivel that everyone who has appeared on these documentaries has or should have an article. No doubt a decent, brave man, and I'm certainly not disparaging his contribution, but certainly does not in any way pass WP:SOLDIER or any other standard of notability and is no more worthy of an article than any one of the other millions of veterans of the Second World War. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not seeing any real notability. Intothat darkness 14:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - most of the coverage is of the form of news articles about the fact that he has talked about his experiences. I'm not getting the right WP:GNG vibe that is needed. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.