Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakubi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hakubi[edit]

The speedy deletion as db-spam was declined by another admin, but I think this needs to be examined at WP:AfD ... all it says is "here's a vitamin pill, widely available". Spam or not? - Dank (push to talk) 22:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 22:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tried to speedy this when it appeared. Probably speedy was declined because it's a bare description of the product with no pitch or weasel words, therefore not spam. But there are other problems with this entry, the biggest of which is probably notabilty. Hairhorn (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, spam. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like spam. 71.3.53.121 (talk) 15:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)^{User:71.3.53.121 made 19 WP:JUSTAVOTE and WP:JNN AfD recommendations in less than 30 minutes after being templated as a single-purpose account on WP:Articles for deletion/Chain smoking — Rankiri (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)}[reply]
Delete. A few searches turn up no sources of value that talk about it. It's a non-notable, brand name version of a supplement with no known medical value. I'd say it's spam. Poorly written spam, but spam. --Transity ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.