Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakim-e-Inqilab Dost Muhammad Sabir Multani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hakim-e-Inqilab Dost Muhammad Sabir Multani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

speedy declined... *sigh*... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy~~ Delete - ~~I think this easily falls into a G1 or an A1 speedy delete... take your pick~~ Pmedema (talk)
- Results are not that different. Fails WP:N and I still sort of feel it falls into an A1 when compairing the article name and the content. Could be considered a bit of a WP:COATRACK?

Have put this article up for speedy delete per A1. WackyWace ^talk 19:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but the AfD-tag must stay. That's the procedure. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Its a very different article to the one I first saw. The version brought to AFD makes no sense to any of us, so I've restored the article to the version that was about a research institute and suggest that if that is deemed notable we rename the article to that - unless the current article name is the Urdu name for the institute? (I have no views on the notability or otherwise of alternative health organisations) Ϣere SpielChequers 20:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The "research institute" does not appear to be notable either...it seems to be some sort of internet-based learning thing (relevant google search).-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 20:28, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails WP:CORP; I cannot find any proof of its notability. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 22:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.