Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Biriyani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 10:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Biriyani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY criteria. The subject is a restaurant with only three local branches, and the references are largely food reviews and a YouTube video. Helenabella (Talk) 05:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Simply not notable at this time, a News search found results but nothing significant as well as Books. Precautionary searches at Highbeam and the freelibrary found nothing which I suspected. SwisterTwister talk 17:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - From what I can gather from the sources I found, it's pretty well known for specializing in a single dish, mutton biriyani, since 1939. I found enough sources to satisfy WP:GNG despite the obvious language barrier:

feature in the Daily Sun
feature in Dhaka Calling
feature in the Daily Star
Lonely Planet (I can't remember if this site is ugc)
Prothom Alo
Dhaka Tribune (link is to the cached version)
little blurb in this travel guide mentions it's an "institution"
Qatar Airways guide - brief mention doesn't really contribute to notability but "Old Dhaka renowned for its Haji Biriyani" just makes me more confident there are even more sources out there — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Helenabella and SwisterTwister: are these enough to reconsider? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi there; I think that's a question for the administrators to make - they're best placed to make a call based on the evidence. Thanks for putting all the support in your comment - I'm sure they will find that useful. Helenabella (Talk) 02:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative keep Yes, the article has issues and is an orphan, but the Daily Star article seems enough to establish notability, stating that it's very well known, significant, etc. I'm not a foodie but I am guessing restaurants are not businesses that tend to get a lot press outside of reviews and profiles on their chefs. I also imagine there are sources in the local language (which I am guessing is Bengali). —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes WP:GNG: The New York Times, Daily Sun, The Daily Star, Dhaka Calling. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:07, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.