Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Arfat Shaikh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ and no indication any additional input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 00:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Arfat Shaikh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:NPOL because he is a un-elected politician and he had served as a Nominated minister, the post may or may not be notable. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 07:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, India, and Maharashtra. Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 07:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: 'Cabinet minister status' doesn't mean that he is minister in the cabinet or member of assembly. Fails GNG and not passes NPOL. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 11:42, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the subject clearly does not hold a posiition that would accord presumed notability under WP:NPOL; that, however, is not grounds for deletion. Whether or not there is sourcing to satify the GNG remains moot as no actual analysis of sources present either in the article or available elsewhere has been presented. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appointment as Chief of the development committee of the new Ayodhya mosque guaranteed to ensure a high profile; there's ongoing coverage of Shaikh since 2017: [1] [2] [3] [4]. Satisfies the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.