Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hajari Mahadev Temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sarsai Nawar. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 09:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hajari Mahadev Temple[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is an Indian temple. A WP:BEFORE found no WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS to establish subject notability. Fails WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:33, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. Willondon (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG . Kpg jhp jm 16:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and Merge with Sarsai Nawar, the Article of the village where this temple is located. The temple has several mentions in mainstream media [1] so a WP:REDIRECT is a valid WP:ATD for a search term. The temple lacks the WP:SIGCOV to merit its own article for now. Courtesy pinging User:Kpgjhpjm and Willondon if they want to reconsider and agree with a redirect. --DBig Xrayᗙ 13:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 14:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge. I agree with and have nothing to add to DBigXray's argument for that course of action. Narky Blert (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge Agree with DBigXray's comments here . Kpg jhp jm 15:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge: DBigXray's suggestion makes sense to me. Willondon (talk) 01:21, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.