Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hail To The King: 60 Years of Destruction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hail To The King: 60 Years of Destruction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A funded and completed Kickstarter project that did get nominated for an award at a small genre film fest, it fails WP:NFILM or WP:GNG with nothing in the way of press coverage in reliable sources that would suggest notability. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's possible there may be some Japanese sources out there I can't find. I've tagged it for the above delsort page accordingly, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 12:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' -- "released online" is hardly a claim to notability. I was not able to find sources that discuss the movie directly and in detail, so delete. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'delete does not meet GNG. looks unpromising when sourced from kickstarter.Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.