Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMP Consultancy Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 14:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HMP Consultancy Services[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any independent, reliable sources that support the notability of this subject. References in the article are either the company's website, or references about labour laws in India without mentioning this company. The article was written by an employee of the company (as disclosed on their talk page: [1]). Singularity42 (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Singularity42 (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The quality of the Article needs to improve but the Company is Notable and the Book an Journal Sources considered are reliable. 27.54.172.71 (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— 27.54.172.71 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --Muhandes (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Purely promotional and horribly written. The keep vote above is by a single-purpose account with only one edit (here, naturally) and should not be taken into consideration. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 20:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Gujarat-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NORG . Created by employee with WP:COI. --Muhandes (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore NCORP guidelines apply. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Mentions-in-passing are not "in-depth". None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I can't find any, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.