Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HJIS Grade 10 of 2015-2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A3. And the snowball is rolling, too. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HJIS Grade 10 of 2015-2016[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I don't see how any of this is appropriate, nor do I see why a grade of the Horizon Japan International School should have its own article. Adam9007 (talk) 00:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a potential candidate for speedy deletion per WP:A3. I also think we should consider deleting the article for Horizon Japan International School as not satisfying WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete..This shouldhave been speedied. It's onlty A7 that can't be used on schools. Obviously the work of a child. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Kudpung. Inherently non-notable. The work of a child. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - I mean seriously? Absolutely zero notability. In fact, if notability could have a negative value, this article would qualify. Although, the main article for the school would likely remain due to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.