Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 28185 b

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, default action is keep. Babajobu 08:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HD 28185 b

Information about this extrasolar planet candidate is already available in the HD 28185 article. This article contains virtually no information, and uses inaccurate terminology (Doppler spectrovision) and total speculation (11% chance of moon?). The text also switches between referring to the planet and the star with no clue to the reader. Chaos syndrome 19:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Tom Harrison ^Talk 19:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete per nomination. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 23:53Z
KEEP and split properly from the parent star to the planet article. (Personally, I think that all stars with planets, and extrasolar planets should have separate articles) 132.205.45.110 22:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT it should be kept as a redirect in any case. 132.205.45.110 22:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per 132.205.45.110. Stifle 01:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect How many planets are there in this universe of ours? Shall we have articles on all of them? Unless the planet is particular notable to us humans for some reason (e.g. it is in our solar system, or it has life on it), inclusion in the star's article should be enough. --SJK 09:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Luka Jačov 08:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.