Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. Rutherford Turnbull

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) -- Lord Roem (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

H. Rutherford Turnbull

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable person, none of the material here is cited, and a Google search doesn't turn up anything noteworthy. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Considering that he has a field of work that wouldn't show easily with searches, I searched deeper by adding "special education" and Google News archives found results, Google Scholar provided some work and co-work and Google Books provided one book that he co-authored. I plan to improve the article soon. SwisterTwister talk 06:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clear pass of WP:Prof#1 with an h-index of 24 including some high cites. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Citations to his book Families, Professionals, and Exceptionality alone show that he was influential in his field. Celtechm (talk) 22:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As well as the reasons given already, his named chair at U. Kansas gives him a clear pass of WP:PROF#C5. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.