Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.K.Nanjundaswamy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

H.K.Nanjundaswamy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general and academic notability guidelines. Google returns no independent coverage and Google News returns a couple of very brief mentions that may not refer to the subject. Google Scholar returns a couple of hits that appear to refer to a HK Nanjundaswamy, but in fact refer to an AM Nanjundaswamy, an Indian food scientist. -- Lear's Fool 06:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 06:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool 06:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF, and the vague wording of his supposed accomplishments in the article makes it difficult to verify them or to tell whether they convey any notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. non-notable. Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG--Sodabottle (talk) 05:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.