Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hélder Arruda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hélder Arruda[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. He played 43 mins of professional football and then disappeared. Local paper Açoriano Oriental is one of the shortest transfer announcements that I've ever seen. Portugoal has 2 sentences on him. I searched him up on ProQuest and found some trivial mentions which also don't count towards notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:11, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: Best I could find is this short page from Rádio e Televisão de Portugal. Still, I don't think this will save the article from deletion. ObserveOwl (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe another 2 like that would be enough? Giant Snowman 21:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that that's a decent source but not enough on its own. Please ping me if another source with the same amount of depth but with different content is found. The source would need to be completely independent too of course. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nomination. Doesn't appear to pass WP:SPORTBASIC. Govvy (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 06:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.