Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hänsel und Gretel (John Pritchard recording)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:NALBUM (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 22:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hänsel und Gretel (John Pritchard recording)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The referred guideline is a an advice on style in the form of an essay. This album as been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works by reputable authors in reliable sources (#1 at WP:NALBUM). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 01:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets the criteria of WP:NALBUM. It has multiple reviews already cited in the article plus this one in the Christian Science Monitor. It's also listed in A Basic Classical and Operatic Recordings Collection for Libraries. The criteria from WikiProject Classical music cited in the nom is merely a WikiProject essay, unlike those at WP:NALBUM which is an official guideline. Voceditenore (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Voceditenore.4meter4 (talk) 02:13, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NALBUM with reviews listed in the article and those above (thanks to Voceditenore).Coolabahapple (talk) 09:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. See Opera, October 1979, p. 975 for further discussion.Niggle1892 (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.