Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwen Randall-Young
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gwen Randall-Young[edit]
- Gwen Randall-Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, standard work for a psychologist, self-penned article, books are self-published Stephen 03:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this is a self-published article, with self-published sources, about her self-published books --T-rex 03:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No big, independent sources to establish her notability. Reads like self-advertisement. -- The_socialist talk? 05:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per The socialist. Blackngold29 06:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, and for including the nauseating phrase "encouraging others to blossom into the wholeness and uniqueness of their being"! -- JediLofty UserTalk 09:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She bridges the worlds of self and spirituality, body, mind and soul. According to herself. Niczar ⏎ 18:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Page Edited to Address Concerns Please note page was updated with references and more details.--Gwen et al (talk) 19:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per blatant COI. --Winger84 (talk) 01:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Bearcat (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No independent evidence of notability outside of COI self-promotion. Bearcat (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note similar Wikipedia page that wasn't deleted. Glenn Harrold is a hypnotherapist and has a similar page layout. Not the most perfect example, yet this page was not deleted. User:Gwen et al--Gwen et al (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Bearcat (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Number of reputable Newspapers/Magazines regularly publishing her columns shows notability.--Gwen et al (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a single blinking one of said newspapers and magazines has its own Wikipedia article at present. Bearcat (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Page updated. Newspapers and magazines now referenced to where they are mentioned in Wikipedia.--Gwen et al--Gwen et al (talk) 21:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a single blinking one of said newspapers and magazines has its own Wikipedia article at present. Bearcat (talk) 20:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.